A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies

Sothivanan Shanmugam; Manikandan Kanagasabai; Elamparuthi Devanathan

doi:doi:10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

| Peer-Reviewed

A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies

Sothivanan Shanmugam, Manikandan Kanagasabai, Elamparuthi Devanathan

Published in Hydrology (Volume 10, Issue 1)

Received: 26 December 2021 Accepted: 19 January 2022 Published: 26 January 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This manuscript analyses the risk management in the oil and gas industries. The manuscript discusses risk management in the consideration of large uncertainties in addition the utilization of adaptive risk management in various conditions. This type of management depends on the certainty that a better choice cannot be made, on the contrary, a few choices must be powerfully followed in order to obtain data and information on the implications of different strategies. Henceforth, the safety in addition risk of management in gas and oil efforts is a basic need. The risk management strategies should be analyzed to avoid the risks happen in the oil and gas industries. Mostly, risks are happened in the oil and gas industries with the human error, natural accidents. In the manuscript, we focus on a case from the oil and gas sector, the primary thing is to gain experience on how the management can carry out risk management while focusing on major hazard information and vulnerability areas. Of late, a few authors have competed to obtain some new types of risk perspectives, including information on how vulnerabilities and dangers are perceived, and the assessment that this article uses these perspectives as a reason for conversation.

Published in	Hydrology (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
Page(s)	12-20
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Risk Management, Oil Industry, Gas Industry, Risk-Based Inspection, Dynamic Risk Assessment

References

[1]	Terje Aven, "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation." European Journal of Operational Research 253, no. 1 (2016): 1-13.
[2]	Faisal Khan, Samith Rathnayaka, and Salim Ahmed. "Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future." Process safety and environmental protection 98 (2015): 116-147.
[3]	Mohammed Ismail Iqbal, Osama Isaac, Ibrahim Al Rajawy, Shamsuddin Khuthbuddin, and Ali Ameen. "Hazard identification and risk assessment with controls (Hirac) in oil industry–A proposed approach." Materials Today: Proceedings 44 (2021): 4898-4902.
[4]	Chao Chen, Changjun Li, Genserik Reniers, and Fuqiang Yang. "Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation: A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS." Journal of Cleaner Production 279 (2021): 123583.
[5]	Mehul Vora, Steinar Sanni, and Roger Flage. "An environmental risk assessment framework for enhanced oil recovery solutions from offshore oil and gas industry." Environmental Impact Assessment Review 88 (2021): 106512.
[6]	Torbjørn Bjerga, and TerjeA ven. "Adaptive risk management using new risk perspectives–an example from the oil and gas industry." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 134 (2015): 75-82.
[7]	Andika Rachman, and RM Chandima Ratnayake. "Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 185 (2019): 518-532.
[8]	Khairul AzizanSuda, Nazatul Shima Abdul Rani, Hamzah Abdul Rahman, and Wang Chen. "A review on risks and project risks management: oil and gas industry." International Journal of Scientific Engineering 6, no. 8 (2015): 938-943.
[9]	Y. Javid, "A bi-objective mathematical model to determine risk-based inspection programs." Process Safety and Environmental Protection 146 (2021): 893-904.
[10]	Behnaz Hosseinnia Davatgar, Nicola Paltrinieri, and Roberto Bubbico. "Safety barrier management: risk-based approach for the oil and gas sector." Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 9, no. 7 (2021): 722.
[11]	Marta Bucelli, Ingrid Bouwer Utne, Pierluigi Salvo Rossi, and Nicola Paltrinieri. "A system engineering approach to subsea spill risk management." Safety Science 123 (2020): 104560.
[12]	Kuok Ho Daniel Tang, "A Case Study of Asset Integrity and Process Safety Management of Major Oil and Gas Companies in Malaysia." Journal of Engineering Research and Reports (2021): 6-19.
[13]	Erik Mygind du Plessis, and Bjarne Vandeskog. "Other stories of resilient safety management in the Norwegian offshore sector: Resilience engineering, bullshit and the de-politicization of danger." Scandinavian Journal of Management 36, no. 1 (2020): 101096.
[14]	U. Idriss, and M. Z. Lawan. "Modelling of Safety Management System (SMS) Using Fire Systemic Safety Management System Model (FSSMS) for Bonga Offshore Oil and Gas Field, Nigeria." Savanna 3, no. 1: 21-27.
[15]	Muhammad Ajmal, Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Bin Isha, Asrar Ahmed Sabir, and Shahrina Md Nordin. "Management Commitment to Safety and Safety Training: The Mediating Role of Safety Compliance for Occupational Accidents in Oil and Gas Industry of Malaysia." AJSS 5, no. 3 (2021): 266-278.
[16]	Razali Bin Hassan, M. M. Asad, Q. M. Soomro, and F. Sherwani. "Severity of the casing and cementing operation with associated potential hazards in the drilling process in the on and offshore oil and gas industry: a cross-sectional investigation into safety management." Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 25 (2017): 129-138.
[17]	Stephen C. Theophilus, Victor N. Esenowo, Andrew O. Arewa, Augustine O. Ifelebuegu, Ernest O. Nnadi, and Fredrick U. Mbanaso. "Human factors analysis and classification system for the oil and gas industry (HFACS-OGI)." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 167 (2017): 168-176.
[18]	Xue Yang, Stein Haugen, and Nicola Paltrinieri. "Clarifying the concept of operational risk assessment in the oil and gas industry." Safety science 108 (2018): 259-268.
[19]	Yuan Gao, Yunxiao Fan, Jing Wang, Xi Li, and Jingjing Pei. "The mediating role of safety management practices in process safety culture in the Chinese oil industry." Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 57 (2019): 223-230.
[20]	Dana Mohammadnazar, and Amir Samimi. "Nessacities of Studying HSE Management Position and Role in Iran Oil Industry." Journal of chemical reviews 1, no. 4 (2019): 252-259.
[21]	Øyvind Dahl, and Trond Kongsvik. "Safety climate and mindful safety practices in the oil and gas industry." Journal of safety research 64 (2018): 29-36.
[22]	Donghong Tian, Chunlan Zhao, Bing Wang, and Meng Zhou. "A MEMCIF-IN method for safety risk assessment in oil and gas industry based on interval numbers and risk attitudes." Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 85 (2019): 269-283. Baladeh, Aliakbar Eslami, Morteza Cheraghi, and Nim aKhakzad. "A multi-objective model to optimal selection of safety measures in oil and gas facilities." Process Safety and Environmental Protection 125 (2019): 71-82.
[23]	Scarponi GE, Paltrinieri N, Khan F, Cozzani V. Reactive and Proactive approaches: tutorials and example. In: Paltrinieri N, Khan FI, editors. Dyn. Risk Anal. Chem. Pet. Ind., Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2016, p. 284.
[24]	Sundaram Haridoss, "Health and Safety Hazards Management in Oil and Gas Industry." International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 6 (6), 1058 1061 (2017).
[25]	Villa V, Paltrinieri N, Khan F, Cozzani V. Towards dynamic risk analysis: A review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry. Saf Sci 2016; 89: 77–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.002.
[26]	Paltrinieri N, Scarponi G. Addressing Dynamic Risk in the Petroleum Industry by Means of Innovative Analysis Solutions. Chem Eng Trans 2014; 36: 451–6. doi: 10.3303/CET1436076.
[27]	Paltrinieri N, Hauge S, Dionisio M, Nelson WR. Towards a dynamic risk and barrier assessment in an IO context. Safety, Reliab. Risk Anal. Beyond Horiz. - Proc. Eur. Saf. Reliab. Conf. ESREL 2013, Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2014, p. 1915–23. doi: 10.1201/b15938-293.
[28]	Paltrinieri N, Hauge S, Nelson WR. Dynamic barrier management: A case of sand erosion integrity. Saf. Reliab. Complex Eng. Syst. Proc. Eur. Saf. Reliab. Conf. ESREL 2015, Zurich, Switzerland: 2015, p. 523–31.
[29]	Paltrinieri N, Hokstad P. Dynamic risk assessment: Development of a basic structure. Saf. Reliab. Methodol. Appl. - Proc. Eur. Saf. Reliab. Conf. ESREL 2014, Wroclaw, Poland: 2015, p. 1385– 92. doi: 10.1201/b17399-191.
[30]	Hashemi SJ, Ahmed S, Khan F. Risk-based operational performance analysis using loss functions. Chem Eng Sci 2014; 116: 99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.04.042.
[31]	Zadakbar O, Khan F, Imtiaz S. Dynamic Risk Assessment of a Nonlinear Non-Gaussian System Using a Particle Filter and Detailed Consequence Analysis. Can J Chem Eng2015; 93: 1201–11. doi: 10.1002/cjce.22212.
[32]	Ali S. Mixture of the inverse Rayleigh distribution: Properties and estimation in a Bayesian framework. Appl Math Model 2015; 39: 515–30. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.05.039.
[33]	Pan J-N, Chen S-C. A loss-function based approach for evaluating reliability improvement of an engineering design. Expert Syst Appl 2013; 40: 5703–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.032.
[34]	Jiang Q, Yan X. Nonlinear plant-wide process monitoring using MI-spectral clustering and Bayesian inference-based multiblock KPCA. J Process Control 2015; 32: 38–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.04.014.
[35]	Ge Z, Song Z. Distributed PCA model for plant-wide process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013; 52: 1947–57. doi: 10.1021/ie301945s.
[36]	Zadakbar O, Imtiaz S, Khan F. Dynamic Risk Assessment and Fault Detection Using Principal Component Analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012; 52: 809–16. doi: 10.1021/ie202880w.
[37]	Paltrinieri N, Tugnoli A, Buston J, Wardman M, Cozzani V. Dynamic Procedure for Atypical Scenarios Identification (DyPASI): A new systematic HAZID tool. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2013; 26: 683–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.01.006.
[38]	Paltrinieri N, Khan F, Amyotte P, Cozzani V. Dynamic approach to risk management: Application to the Hoeganaes metal dust accidents. Process Saf Environ Prot2013; 92: 669–79. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.008.
[39]	Paltrinieri N, Tugnoli A, Buston J, Wardman M. Dy PASI Methodology: from Information Retrieval to Integration of HAZID Process. Chem Eng Trans 2013; 32: 433–8. doi: 10.3303/CET1332073.
[40]	Pasman H, Rogers W. How can we use the information provided by process safety performance indicators? Possibilities and limitations. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2014; 30: 197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.06.001.
[41]	CCPS. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE); 2008.
[42]	Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2012; 104: 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003.
[43]	CSChE. Process Safety Management Guide. 4^th ed. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering; 2011. doi: 10.1201/b11069-30.
[44]	Christou MD, Amendola A, Smeder M. The control of major accident hazards: The land-use planning issue. J Hazard Mater 1999; 65: 151–78. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00261-1.
[45]	API. Recommended Practice 581: Risk-Based Inspection Technology. 3^rd ed. Washington: American Petroleum Institute; 2016.
[46]	Cozzani V, Bandini R, Basta C, Christou MD. Application of land-use planning criteria for the control of major accident hazards: a case-study. J Hazard Mater 2006; 136: 170–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.031.
[47]	Vinnem JE, Bye R, Gran BA, Kongsvik T, Nyheim OM, Okstad EH, et al. Risk modelling of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2012; 25: 274–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.11.001.
[48]	Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K. Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2009; 22: 600–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.04.006.
[49]	Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot2013; 91: 46–53.doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sothivanan Shanmugam, Manikandan Kanagasabai, Elamparuthi Devanathan. (2022). A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies. Hydrology, 10(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sothivanan Shanmugam; Manikandan Kanagasabai; Elamparuthi Devanathan. A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies. Hydrology. 2022, 10(1), 12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sothivanan Shanmugam, Manikandan Kanagasabai, Elamparuthi Devanathan. A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies. Hydrology. 2022;10(1):12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12,
  author = {Sothivanan Shanmugam and Manikandan Kanagasabai and Elamparuthi Devanathan},
  title = {A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies},
  journal = {Hydrology},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-20},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hyd.20221001.12},
  abstract = {This manuscript analyses the risk management in the oil and gas industries. The manuscript discusses risk management in the consideration of large uncertainties in addition the utilization of adaptive risk management in various conditions. This type of management depends on the certainty that a better choice cannot be made, on the contrary, a few choices must be powerfully followed in order to obtain data and information on the implications of different strategies. Henceforth, the safety in addition risk of management in gas and oil efforts is a basic need. The risk management strategies should be analyzed to avoid the risks happen in the oil and gas industries. Mostly, risks are happened in the oil and gas industries with the human error, natural accidents. In the manuscript, we focus on a case from the oil and gas sector, the primary thing is to gain experience on how the management can carry out risk management while focusing on major hazard information and vulnerability areas. Of late, a few authors have competed to obtain some new types of risk perspectives, including information on how vulnerabilities and dangers are perceived, and the assessment that this article uses these perspectives as a reason for conversation.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies
AU  - Sothivanan Shanmugam
AU  - Manikandan Kanagasabai
AU  - Elamparuthi Devanathan
Y1  - 2022/01/26
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
T2  - Hydrology
JF  - Hydrology
JO  - Hydrology
SP  - 12
EP  - 20
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7617
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
AB  - This manuscript analyses the risk management in the oil and gas industries. The manuscript discusses risk management in the consideration of large uncertainties in addition the utilization of adaptive risk management in various conditions. This type of management depends on the certainty that a better choice cannot be made, on the contrary, a few choices must be powerfully followed in order to obtain data and information on the implications of different strategies. Henceforth, the safety in addition risk of management in gas and oil efforts is a basic need. The risk management strategies should be analyzed to avoid the risks happen in the oil and gas industries. Mostly, risks are happened in the oil and gas industries with the human error, natural accidents. In the manuscript, we focus on a case from the oil and gas sector, the primary thing is to gain experience on how the management can carry out risk management while focusing on major hazard information and vulnerability areas. Of late, a few authors have competed to obtain some new types of risk perspectives, including information on how vulnerabilities and dangers are perceived, and the assessment that this article uses these perspectives as a reason for conversation.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sothivanan Shanmugam

Department of Chemical Engineering, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India
Manikandan Kanagasabai

Department of Chemical Engineering, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India
Elamparuthi Devanathan

Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sothivanan Shanmugam, Manikandan Kanagasabai, Elamparuthi Devanathan. (2022). A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies. Hydrology, 10(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sothivanan Shanmugam; Manikandan Kanagasabai; Elamparuthi Devanathan. A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies. Hydrology. 2022, 10(1), 12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sothivanan Shanmugam, Manikandan Kanagasabai, Elamparuthi Devanathan. A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies. Hydrology. 2022;10(1):12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12,
  author = {Sothivanan Shanmugam and Manikandan Kanagasabai and Elamparuthi Devanathan},
  title = {A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies},
  journal = {Hydrology},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-20},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hyd.20221001.12},
  abstract = {This manuscript analyses the risk management in the oil and gas industries. The manuscript discusses risk management in the consideration of large uncertainties in addition the utilization of adaptive risk management in various conditions. This type of management depends on the certainty that a better choice cannot be made, on the contrary, a few choices must be powerfully followed in order to obtain data and information on the implications of different strategies. Henceforth, the safety in addition risk of management in gas and oil efforts is a basic need. The risk management strategies should be analyzed to avoid the risks happen in the oil and gas industries. Mostly, risks are happened in the oil and gas industries with the human error, natural accidents. In the manuscript, we focus on a case from the oil and gas sector, the primary thing is to gain experience on how the management can carry out risk management while focusing on major hazard information and vulnerability areas. Of late, a few authors have competed to obtain some new types of risk perspectives, including information on how vulnerabilities and dangers are perceived, and the assessment that this article uses these perspectives as a reason for conversation.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review in Enhancing Hydrological Safety by Implementing Risk Management Strategies
AU  - Sothivanan Shanmugam
AU  - Manikandan Kanagasabai
AU  - Elamparuthi Devanathan
Y1  - 2022/01/26
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
T2  - Hydrology
JF  - Hydrology
JO  - Hydrology
SP  - 12
EP  - 20
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7617
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20221001.12
AB  - This manuscript analyses the risk management in the oil and gas industries. The manuscript discusses risk management in the consideration of large uncertainties in addition the utilization of adaptive risk management in various conditions. This type of management depends on the certainty that a better choice cannot be made, on the contrary, a few choices must be powerfully followed in order to obtain data and information on the implications of different strategies. Henceforth, the safety in addition risk of management in gas and oil efforts is a basic need. The risk management strategies should be analyzed to avoid the risks happen in the oil and gas industries. Mostly, risks are happened in the oil and gas industries with the human error, natural accidents. In the manuscript, we focus on a case from the oil and gas sector, the primary thing is to gain experience on how the management can carry out risk management while focusing on major hazard information and vulnerability areas. Of late, a few authors have competed to obtain some new types of risk perspectives, including information on how vulnerabilities and dangers are perceived, and the assessment that this article uses these perspectives as a reason for conversation.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download